Tancil v. Woolls

Supreme Court of the United States | 1964-10-26

379 U.S. 19
Per Curiam.

. The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. Mr. Justice Brennan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Chat with this case!
Use this chat window to ask questions about this specific case. During this chat session, the AI will not have access to any other outside materials other than this case.
     Verify the results before relying on them.