Ziemer v. City of New Orleans
Louisiana Supreme Court | 1940-06-28
195 La. 1054,197 So. 754
On Rehearing.
In stating the defendant’s contention in this case, we inadvertently omitted the word "prior” oh page 10 of our opinion.' The defendant’s contention "was that “the court erred in ordering the City to appropriate out of the general fund a sum' adequate to maintain the department, and in no event, an amount less than that required prior to 1921.” Therefore, our original opinion is corrected to read accordingly.
With this explanation and correction, the application for a rehearing is refused.
Chat with this case!
Use this chat window to ask questions about this specific case. During this chat session, the AI will not have access to any other outside materials other than this case.
Verify the results before relying on them.