Sizeler v. Sizeler
Louisiana Supreme Court | 1930-03-05
127 So. 388,170 La. 128
(concurring).
I subscribe to the decree in this case and to the ruling that the taking out of life insurance is not a donation by the insured to the beneficiary, but I am also firm in the opinion that, according to the ruling in Texada v. Spence, 166 La. 1020, 118 So. 120, 62 A. L. R. 281, the relation or status of the insured and the beneficiary named in the policy of insurance was not a state'of concubinage, even though the marriage was not valid in this state.
Chat with this case!
Use this chat window to ask questions about this specific case. During this chat session, the AI will not have access to any other outside materials other than this case.
Verify the results before relying on them.