State v. W.J. Austin
Louisiana Supreme Court | 1926-01-04
107 So. 126,160 La. 324
Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. The only question propounded is whether he was entitled to be informed, in response to a motion for a bill of particulars, of the name or identity of the person alleged tOohave bought the liquor, provided he was a nonresident or stranger in the parish, or was biased or prejudiced against, or an enemy of the defendant. The question was answered in the negative in the case of State v. Hebert (No. 27442) 107 So. 123, 1 decided to-day. For the reasons given in that ease,
The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
1
Ante, p. 316.
Chat with this case!
Use this chat window to ask questions about this specific case. During this chat session, the AI will not have access to any other outside materials other than this case.
Verify the results before relying on them.